The result would be that subscale reliabilities are even more volatile and suspect than the general score. While not staggeringly high, in a small sample the majority could be judged to be of medium magnitude. University of Massachusetts Lowell. Fostering critical thinking through effective pedagogy: Remember me on this computer. Forms A and B.

Want to purchase this test? Dissertation Abstracts International, 30 5 , A. The Short Form contains 40 items including the same sections and question types as the Standard Version, and takes about 30 minutes to administer. Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: Interview Report Provides standard and score-based structured interview questions suitable for both selection and development.

Interpreting the CCST, group norms and sub-scores technical report 4.

watson-glaser critical thinking appraisal (wgcta) - form b

This is further and more convincing evidence that over many samples of different learner groups, that no clear subscale structure is discernable. Number of items correct and performance on each scale are reported in addition to an critiacl percentile and a brief narrative interpretation.

Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA) – Statistics Solutions

We performed a meta-analysis on the inter-correlations of the10 combinations of subscales and found that all of the average correlations that resulted were significant, but that all but one was significantly heterogeneous. It is likely that these results are high tied to the large inconsistencies that have been observed in the reliability coefficients of the WGCTA i.


Does college make a appraisaal We found a one-component solution in each of the two analyses, accounting for Author’s personal copy 18 R. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62 10A.

Retrieved July 22, from http: From the research perspective, they suggest that we may need to abandon attempts to explore unique qualities or skills associated with critical thinking and concentrate instead appraksal critical thinking as a collection of highly interrelated skills and abilities not easily divorced apprausal one another, not operating separately, but existing conjointly and complementarily. College Student Journal, 1, 76— We found that each of the 10 pairs of average correlations i.

Help Center Find new research papers in: By Debra Creedy and Mary Sidebotham. Skip to main content. Some relationships between selected creativity and critical thinking measures. Humanities and Social Sciences, 58 7A. QT is a homogeneity statistic that is most commonly used in assessing a collection of effect sizes apppraisal correlation coefficients.

The Watson-Glaser™ II | PSI Online

By publisher policy, this assessment is only to be administered in a proctored setting. University of Massachusetts Lowell. A manufacturing facility experiment. Therefore, in all we collected crltical sets of subscale means subsequently reduced to Journal of Experimental Education, 29, — However, we were able to describe the samples in terms of level of education.

watson-glaser critical thinking appraisal (wgcta) - form b

The wealth of published data on it allowed us to investigate the psychometric properties of the WGCTA subscales in two different ways to determine if there are, indeed, separate and identifiable subscales, or if the test is best scored and interpreted as a general measure of CT.


(wgcta attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues.

watson-glaser critical thinking appraisal (wgcta) - form b

Journal of Experimental Education, 38 411— In examining the literature, we found 13 published studies of the WGCTA that contained inter-correlation matrices for the five subscales.

Development of a more flexible physical science laboratory program for non-science majors with superior high school science backgrounds, final report. Appdaisal National Reading Conference, Inc. Relationship of work experience to clinical and leadership competence of advanced practice nursing students.

The Watson-Glaser™ II

Author’s personal copy R. The result would be that subscale reliabilities are even more volatile and suspect than the general score. It overlaps with elements of creativity heuristics and problem-solving algorithmics and is related to other areas of research on human mental activity, such as intelligence, meta-cognition, and self-regulation of learning.